I found two typical examples of
disclaimers in web advertising. The first one is the website ads of Apple Store
http://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/terms/site.html
while the other is from Occupational Therapy (http://www.otaus.com.au/disclaimers/list/asset_id/1/cid/1/parent/0/t/disclaimers).
Both disclaimers provided on websites are legally effective.
As I discovered that the primary purpose of a website
disclaimer is to limit the liabilities that a website owner or publisher may
suffer arising out of the website, as well as to qualify other information on
the site. Those liabilities that publishers must contend with include
defamation, copyright infringement and breach of privacy. I learned that there
are two standards a business must comply with to eliminate inherent risks in
using disclaimers. Firstly, businesses must adequately draw the consumer’s
attention to the qualifying statement. Secondly, the disclaimer must be
effective in remedying the main statement.
In terms of the first rule, disclaimers on both web
advertising I mentioned are accessed via a link at the bottom of every page in
relatively small print. In this way, there is no guarantee that consumers will
see them. According to the ACCC Advertising and Selling Guide, businesses
should make more efforts to make disclaimers conspicuous. For instance, to place
disclaimers on a compulsory page, leaving consumers no choice but to view them
at some stage while in the site. Another more appropriate way is to use
dialogue box that contains claimers opens on users’ screen when they access the
website before they make a purchase. For the effectiveness of a disclaimer,
Apple Store and Occupational Therapy both made qualified statements. The
reasons are that disclaimers in those two websites are accurate, clear and in
precise terms. In addition, claimers do not contradict any advertising claims.
Furthermore, both advertising adequately disclose material terms for goods and
services.
Therefore, claimers in advertising websites from
Apple Store and Occupational Therapy are legally effective. However, the
inherent risks would be minimized if they make their claimers more compelling.

No comments:
Post a Comment