I do not think Australian ISPs should be forced to filter
Internet content, although mandatory filtering for Australian ISPs can protect children
from exposure to RC-rated content when they are online to some extend. There
are much more issues associated with Internet content filtering should be taken
into consideration.
The first problem is the difficulty in identifying prohibited
content which required to be filtered for mandatory ISP filtering. As I found
that ISPs can not filter all material for prohibited content unless they are
told which particular content is prohibited contend. The Australian
Broadcasting Authority had only notified ISPs limited items of content that had
identified. Therefore, blocking those partial items that expected to increase
constantly would not protect children effectively. The second issue should be addressed
is overblocking and underblocking of filters. Filters vary in their
effectiveness. According to the data measured by their rates of failure to
block prohibited content identified by the ABA. I discovered that some approved
filter vendors had not added all ABA notified items of content to their
blacklists. Subsequently, the filters failed to block some notified content,
and may incorrectly block a
significant percentage of material that apparently should not have been blocked
including sexual health and education. The risk of privacy infringement is the
third issue. I learned that auditing and tracking is an important feature of
many Internet filtering products, except for blocking access to unacceptable
content. Thus, surfing activity of individual users can be examined. The
potential for mis-use or inadvertent disclosure of detail of customers’
Internet usage would threaten users’ privacy.
ISP level filtering won't work

No comments:
Post a Comment